Mitsubishi FM132 / FM145 / FM146

5-speed manual · longitudinal · 1985–1992

Also known as: fm132, fm145, fm146, fm-132, fm-145, fm-146, mitsubishi fm

Mitsubishi's five-speed manual family, supplied to Ford for the first-generation Ranger and the Bronco II through the second half of the 1980s. All three members are five-speeds with a removable bellhousing and a twelve-bolt stamped steel bottom pan, which is how one is told apart from the Mazda M5OD that replaced it — that gearbox has an integral bellhousing.

They share one gear set: 3.769, 2.210, 1.516, 1.00 and 0.812. What separates them is drivetrain and case length.

FM145 — the earliest, 1985 to 1987, four-wheel drive, behind the 2.8 and 2.9 V6 and the 2.3 Mitsubishi turbodiesel.
FM146 — 1988 to 1992, four-wheel drive, a strengthened replacement for the FM145 behind the fuel-injected 2.9.
FM132 — 1988 to 1992, two-wheel drive only, with the 2.9.

The FM145 and FM146 do not interchange, and the reason is an inch of case. The FM146's casting is roughly an inch longer. Fitting one where the other was means a different propshaft length and different transfer case linkage — so a used gearbox that bolts up is not the same thing as a used gearbox that fits.

They take heavy gear oil, which is worth stating plainly because the Toyo Kogyo units that preceded them in the same trucks and the Mazda unit that followed both take automatic transmission fluid. Three consecutive Ranger gearboxes, two fluid regimes — and getting it wrong is a slow, quiet failure rather than an obvious one.

Cars fitted with this gearbox

1 generation. Only where a source names the model and the generation together — a gearbox is documented as a product far more often than as a fitment, so this list is deliberately shorter than the truth.

Ford

Ranger First generation

Information, not instruction

CarGeek is a reference, not a service manual. Its pages are written from public sources and from what other people have found, never from a manufacturer's own service information, so they can be wrong or incomplete for your particular vehicle. Some of what they describe carries real risk: high voltage, fuel under pressure, stored energy, hot and moving parts.

Have anything you intend to act on checked by a trained person against the manufacturer's own procedure for your vehicle. Nothing here replaces that procedure.

Community experience

Be the first to write this up

Nothing posted about this yet. Whatever you found is worth writing down — even a dead end saves someone the same afternoon.

What makes one worth reading:

The car — make, model, year and engine. The same fault behaves differently on each.
What you measured, not only what you replaced.
What actually fixed it — or that nothing did, which is worth knowing too.